News
A Tough Election Season for the Coal Industry
Thursday, October 26th, 2006
Cross-posted from Lazyhorse’s Diary on Daily Kos.
This November is shaping up to be one of the toughest election seasons for the coal industry in recent memory. No industry other than oil has benefited more from the attack on environmental and safety regulations over the last 6 years by the Bush Administration and the congressional leadership. From weakening mercury rules and attempts to weaken the Clean Air Act (in the form of the Orwellian “Clear Skies Actâ€?), to weakening the Clean Water Act by allowing mining waste to be dumped indiscriminately in our nation’s waterways, the massive investments by the coal industry to buy the favor of Congress and the White House has never seen a better return on investment.
In the upcoming election, those tables seem to be turning. Of the 6 incumbent senators that have accepted the most coal industry money, 4 are at serious risk of losing their seats. According to opensecrets.org, the senators receiving the most coal industry money are:
Rank State Senator Coal industry contributions
1 PA Santorum, Rick (R) $93,050
2 VA Allen, George (R) $69,050
3 MO Talent, James M (R) $54,050
4 WV Byrd, Robert C (D) $41,350
5 KY McConnell, Mitch (R) $41,350
6 OH DeWine, Mike (R) $26,300
Of course, many poll-watchers will recognize a lot of the names on that list as incumbents at the greatest risk of losing their seats. Below are those same six senators with their Real Clear Politics (RCP) ranking (for seats in greatest danger of changing parties) as well as the RCP average of where they stand in recent polls against their challengers:
State Senator RCP rank RCP average
PA Santorum, Rick (R) 1 -10.2
VA Allen, George (R) 6 +1.3
MO Talent, James M (R) 5 +1.3
WV Byrd, Robert C (D) na.
KY McConnell, Mitch (R) na.
OH DeWine, Mike (R) 2 -9.2
Almost makes you feel bad for the coal industry, doesn’t it?
Ha!
A similar picture emerges when we look at the House. The 10 House incumbents receiving the most coal industry money, according to opensecrets.org, are as follows:
Rank District Rep Coal contributions
1 PA-18 Murphy, Tim (R) $29,821
2 OH-18 Ney, Bob (R) $28,350
3 KY-4 Davis, Geoff (R) $21,000
4 VA-9 Boucher, Rick (D) $20,450
5 WY-AL Cubin, Barbara (R) $20,000
6 TN-9 Ford, Harold E Jr (D) $18,000
7 WV-2 Capito, Shelley (R) $16,250
8 PA-4 Hart, Melissa (R) $16,249
9 CA-11 Pombo, Richard (R) $15,500
10 IN-8 Hostettler, John (R) $12,500
Of these 10 seats, 5 are in serious jeopardy of changing hands, according to RCP’s rankings of vulnerable House seats. Here is where those incumbents (or in some cases where the incumbent stepped down, their successor as candidate for their political party) stand:
PA-18 Murphy, Tim (R) na. (Safe Republican)
OH-18 Ney, Bob (R) 8 -8.0 (RCP average)
KY-4 Davis, Geoff (R) 29 tie
VA-9 Boucher, Rick (D) na. (Safe Democrat)
WY-AL Cubin, Barbara (R) na. +7 (Mason-Dixon)
TN-9 Ford, Harold E Jr (D) na. (Safe Democrat)
WV-2 Capito, Shelley (R) na. (Safe Republican)
PA-4 Hart, Melissa (R) 46 +4 (Keystone Poll)
CA-11 Pombo, Richard (R) 38 +1 (Lake Research)
IN-8 Hostettler, John (R) 4 -15.0 (RCP average)
Whether or not the leadership of the House and/or Senate changes hands, the possibility of enacting meaningful energy legislation to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels will be far better in 2007 and 2008 – and the need to defend our most popular and important environmental laws will be greatly reduced.
The likely shakeup in the House and Senate isn’t just good news for Democrats, it’s good news for all of us that breathe air and drink water.
November 15th, 2006 at 4:27 pm
I am curious to See Harold Ford’s name up there: his environmental agenda during the campaign was very agressive and pro-alternative energy. Any comments on this?
November 22nd, 2006 at 11:34 am
I was just as surprised, to tell you the truth. But Appalachian Voices’ Washington Liason, Sarah Olesiuk, has spoken directly with his office. I’ll see if she can comment.
-Matt Wasson
November 28th, 2006 at 10:45 am
Hi Ross,
Like you, I was also shocked to see Ford’s name on this list. Earlier in the year I spoke with Ford’s Legislative Aid who focuses on environmental issues. The Aid reacted very positively to the Clean Water Protection Act, legislation that would help stop MTR. I had a meeting scheduled to talk more in depth with Ford’s office about the Clean Water Protection Act after the election, but unfortunately, Ford lost his Senate race and the meeting never occurred. Interestingly, there are Representatives who have cosponsored the Clean Water Protection Act who have also received campaign contributions from big coal. I hope this helps answer your question. Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks for your interest,
Sarah Olesiuk
July 24th, 2008 at 1:20 am
I noticed that Tim Murphy (R-PA, representative) tops the list for coal funding and is on the energy committee. Steve O’Donnell will be his opponent this fall and is decent person to boot.
What percent of this coal is shipped overseas? I’d like to find out more about the final destination of the coal mined in this region.
Thanks!