This just in from our friend DevilsTower over at DailyKos. He just nails the “mountaintop removal vs. the economy” argument with this one:
There’s nothing good about this recession. With millions of people losing their jobs, their homes, their health care, their educational choices… such times are “opportunities” only in the same way that a hard punch to the face is an opportunity to yearn for the time when your nose was still straight.
Still, not everything that results from a disaster is a disaster. People who have held jobs in large companies may become entrepreneurs out of necessity rather than choice — but some portion of them will succeed in ways we can’t yet predict, bringing a new vitality to our economy. Politicians enticed to support massive corporate excess will temporarily display enough sense (or chagrin) to pass regulations that may blunt the next cycle of greed run wild. Natural resources strained by rapid growth may benefit from at least a momentary slow-down in the rapacious “progress.”
When things are going well, it’s hard to stop and ask “are we doing the right thing?” Now that things aren’t going so well, the temptation is to split our time between looking at where we went wrong and scrambling to get things back just the way they were. But there’s a real opportunity here, one that can both create jobs, help the environment, and send a message about corporate responsibility.
We can end mountaintop removal mining. Right now. Immediately.
At first glance, this may seem like the worst possible time to address such a problem. After all, we are talking about people’s jobs — not to mention the half of all electricity in the United States that comes from coal. But the situation isn’t that simple.
…
…
…
Read the entire post here.
No comments yet » Leave your own...
During the campaign, President Obama promised to make protecting Appalachian streams a primary task of his EPA. Earlier this week Mike Shapiro, the Acting Assistant Administrator for the EPA Office of Water, testified before the the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and the Environment regarding the EPA’s priorities in the upcoming year. 
Many in Appalachia are curious about where the well-being of our region falls on that list of priorities.
In response to the recent public outcry about EPA’s approval of dozens of new mining permits (including many mountaintop removal sites with multiple valley fills), freshman Democratic Congressman Tom Perriello (VA-05) sought to get some straight answers from EPA on how they plan to handle the mountaintop removal issue moving forward.
Congressman Perriello: Mr Shapiro, my understanding is that the EPA is currently reviewing about 150 to 200 mountaintop removal permits, and of the ones reviewed so far, roughly 90% have been permitted. Do you expect that percentage to remain in place with the remaining permits?
Mr. Shapiro: Its tough to predict. As you indicated, we’ve started a review focusing on those that were furthest along in the process, and as you indicated a relatively small percentage had been identified for further review by the agency in discussion with the Army corps of Engineers and the permittees
As we go forward it depends on the mix of proposals that are present. The kinds of considerations that weigh in our judgment when we decide to raise issues have to do with the scope and scale of the impact of the proposed mine, the sensitivity of the resources that might be impacted and at least our initial assessment of the degree to which damages have been avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
I think that although the evidence we have in the first 200 is the best we have to project into the future, we can�t guarantee, we�re not shooting for a specific percentage. We�re really shooting to identify those that are seriously problematic and to try and address them.
Congressman Perriello: When you say you�re looking at the ones furthest along, do you mean that have done the most to look at potential impacts on the ecosystem and environment, or simply furthest along in terms of investment and development?
Mr. Shapiro: Furthest along in the Corps permitting process, thank you for that question to allow me to clarify. What had happened is that because of some uncertainty involving lawsuits that were in play, there had been a hold up in the backlog of permits – had developed over time. So in fairness to the permitees we have focused early attention on those that were furthest along in terms of temporally their readiness for permitting in the view of the Corps� process. As we work out way through that backlog we�ll try to do that in a way that respects the amount of time its taken already to get the permit up to where it is.
Congressman Perriello: Is their an issue at all with a lack of funding for oversight that hinders your ability to review and suggest alternatives to some of these mountaintop removal situations, around Appalachia in particular.
Mr. Shapiro: At this point I think we have, in my view, resources to do the job in front of us. Like anyone else, I think if we had more staff who were experienced in this area its possible we could move faster, but we were able to juggle the resources we have by focusing on those that are the highest priority, getting the maximum results in terms of our investment in staff.
Watch the video here. The exchange with Congressman Perriello begins at about 1:56:20.
No comments yet » Leave your own...
Check out Jim Hightower’s latest take on the Obama Administration’s handling of mountaintop removal coal mining at the link below
http://jimhightower.com/node/6849
No comments yet » Leave your own...
Duke says the increase is necessary for coal fired power plant upgrades, but acknowledges it could be hard on customers.
Note also that as of January, North Carolina pays the second highest price for coal of any state in the the United States.
Read the article at CharlotteOberserver.com
No comments yet » Leave your own...
